Instructor Guidelines and Grading Policy educational psychology and leadership studies
|
![]() |
Grading Policy
Note —any departure from this grading system must be submitted in writing to the Chair of the Department.
Approval of the Chair must be obtained prior to the distribution of the course outline.
1. When numerical marking is used at the Undergraduate or Graduate level, normally the following conversion from
percentage to letter grades will be used:
A+ >95 A- 85-89 B 75-79 C+ 65-69 D 51-59
A 90-94 B+ 80-84 B- 70-74 C 60-64 E or F <50
2. In assigning grades at the undergraduate level, the following guidelines should be followed:
Passing Grade
A+ Outstanding scholarship and originality. Complete mastery of subject matter.
A Excellent scholarship displaying strong knowledge, synthesis and application of concepts.
A- Very good scholarship showing depth of knowledge and analytical ability.
B+ Good scholarship, high knowledge level and good application of information.
B Steady performance, not outstanding in knowledge or application.
B- Good knowledge but some lack of understanding, ability, or background.
C+ Satisfactory knowledge, limited application and demonstration of understanding.
C Satisfactory knowledge, definite lack of some information, no application.
D Marginally satisfactory (but not failure), noticeable gaps in knowledge and understanding.
Failing Grades
E Failing grade: Conditional supplemental. (note—undergraduate only) No supplementals offered in the Faculty of Graduate Studies.
F Failing grade: No supplemental
N Failing grade: Did not write examination or otherwise complete course requirements by the end of the term or session; no supplemental.
3. The recommended distribution of undergraduate grades (subject to class size and/or special circumstances) should approximate the following:
4. In assigning grades at the graduate level, the following guidelines should be followed:
A+ Unusually superior scholarship, incorporating originality. Complete mastery of subject matter.
A Superior scholarship showing complete comprehension and synthesis of the subject matter.
A- Excellent scholarship showing complete comprehension and sound application of information.
B+ Very good scholarship showing sound comprehension and good application of information.
B Satisfactory scholarship, some lack in comprehension and application of subject matter.
B- Marginally graduate performance, noticeable gaps in knowledge or ability. Concerns about understanding and competency.
<B- Unsatisfactory (i.e., student's status must be reviewed by the supervisory committee of the student and a recommendation for continuation be made to the Dean).
If You Have an Academic Problem or Concern
Depending on the nature of the academic matter or concern, the order in which you would normally seek assistance or redress is:
1. Your program supervisor
2. Departmental graduate advisor for your arera
3. Departmental chair
4. Dean of the Faculty of Graduate Studies
5. The Senate
If the problem is related to a specific course, the first person you should contact is the course instructor.
In addition, you may wish to consult the UVic Students' Society Ombudsperson, who can be located at:
SUB B205 (upstairs) phone: 250-721-8357, ombuddy@uvic.ca, www.uvss.uvic.ca/ombudsperson, Monday to Friday.
submitted for Department Approval—February 13 . 98
Jan. 5 . 06